www.debito.org
THE
NATIONAL POLICE AGENCY'S
"NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POLICE SCIENCE"
AND ITS "GENETIC RACIAL PROFILING"
CRIME PREVENTION RESEARCH
By Arudou Debito (debito@debito.org)
January 5, 2004 (freely forwardable)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
------------------------------------------
The National Research Institute of Police Science (NRIPS), a
branch of Japan's
National Police Agency, has on its website (http://www.nrips.go.jp)
a policy proposal to create a crime "index" of "foreignness"
in its forensic science. An attempt to foil allegedly rampant foreign
crime, NRIPS
claims that it can test minute samples of blood and semen from crime
scenes to determine
the nationality of the perpetrator. However, their science is faulty by
assuming
that "Japaneseness" is a matter of race--expressly stating that
Japanese
DNA is racially and biologically "different". In fact, Japan's gene
pool
has historical traces of Korean, Chinese, Ainu, Ryukyuan, Brazilian,
Peruvian etc.
in it, not including the children of 40,000 international marriages per
annum and
300,000 naturalized citizens since 1968. Therefore, this test may say
something about
the "racial background" of the suspect, but it cannot determine the
presence
or absence of Japanese nationality.
While snake-oil science like this should amount to no more than
snickers for putting
one over on the taxpayer yet again (Japan already has DNA tests, making
the 21 million
yen requested for this policy an utter waste), this proposal is not a
harmless white
elephant. It may misconstrue data, at the expense of Japan's
international minorities.
"False positives" (i.e. test results indicating that racially-diverse
Japanese
suspects are "foreign") could erroneously inflate the "foreign crime
rate", further fueling Japan's current scapegoating of foreigners as
criminals.
The social irresponsibility of the National Police Agency must be
pointed out for
what it is--racism--by proposing social policy, using race as an
analytical paradigm,
based on faulty concepts and fallacious attributions.
------------------------------------------
THE TEXT OF THIS POLICY, WITH CRITIQUE
The following policy proposal is from the official NRIPS site (http://www.nrips.go.jp/evaluation/H13/link10.html,
or else click here for
a scanned printout version
if the NPA has decided to remove the text from their site). Although
there is a mirror
site in English (http://www.npa.go.jp/english/index.htm),
there is no English translation whatsoever of policy proposals or
recent works (http://www.nrips.go.jp/evaluation/index.html)
What follows is my translation of the policy proposal in question, with
comments
interjected.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
NRIPS WRITES:
TITLE OF POLICY:
"The Development of an Index using
Biological Materials for use in Investigating Foreign Crime"
(gaikokujin hanzai
o kyuumei suru tame no seitai shiryou o mochiita shihyou no kaihatsu)
OUTLINE OF POLICY: In our country (wagakuni), with the advent of
economic and social
internationalization, there has been a rapid rise (kyuuzou) in heinous
crimes (kyouaku
hanzai) connected to foreigners coming to Japan. There has likewise
been a huge increase
in social insecurity (shakai fuan) in citizen (shimin) lifestyles both
in Tokyo and
across the nation. [text continues below]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
MY COMMENT:
Right from the get-go are the canards and assumptions. Why
are "internationalization"
and "heinous crimes" thus inexorably linked by our boys in blue? Is an
assumption so easily made that more foreigners means a rise in the
crime rate?
Of course, logically speaking, more people means more crime--as there
are crooks
in any crowd. However, when one talks about incidents of crime, numbers
have been
going up for both Japanese and foreigners (cf NPA crime stats for
January-July 2003,
http://www.npa.go.jp).
Moreover, since the foreign
population has been growing more rapidly than the Japanese, the
comparative crime
RATE for foreigners has been relatively static--in many crime
categories lower than
the Japanese. Even for crimes classified as "heinous" (kyouaku), such
as
mugging (goutou, down 5.4%) and breaking-and-entering (shin'nyuu
goutou, down 24.1%),
it is dropping (ibid). In any case, depending on how you choose to
calculate the
rate (see statistical problems with the data set at http://www.debito.org/crimestats.html),
between 96% and 99% of all non-visa-related crimes in Japan are
committed by Japanese.
So why focus on the foreigners? Because fear loosens public
pursestrings and justifies
budgetary outlay. It also gives the NPA an excuse for their
unprecedently low clearance
rate (around 20%) of crimes: "We can't help it, because hordes of
unpredictable
new foreigners are doing it"--an excuse made by even the highest levels
of local
government (Tokyo Gov Ishihara, Japan Times, Dec 31, 2003).
Referential sites:
http://www.debito.org/crimestats.html
http://www.debito.org/ishiharahikokusaika.html
http://www.debito.org/foreigncrimeputsch.html
http://www.debito.org/worldcup2002.html
Japan Times Dec 31, 2003 article:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20031231b3.htm
Something so easily forgotten, when vilifying both foreigners and the
process of
internationalization, is that lots of people want "kokusaika". For
example,
why are there suddenly so many Nikkei Brazilians and Peruvians in
Japan? (They are
now the second-biggest foreign minority in Japan, comprising
double-digit population
percentages in some towns in Aichi, Gifu, and Shizuoka Prefectures.)
Because Japanese
government policy in the 1990's brought them here--as laborers for
major factories
like Toyota and Yamaha (which could pay foreign laborers much less than
Japanese,
as well as avoid legal requirements for social security and other
costly benefits
guaranteed all Japanese full-time workers).
Also, studies by both the UN and the Prime Minister's office in 2000 (http://www.debito.org/A.html)
have stressed the need for more foreign influx, indicating that
immigration will
keep Japan's welfare systems afloat in the world's fastest-aging
society. For an
institution as powerful and supposedly venerable as the National Police
Agency to
allege and stress only the negative aspects of internationalization, is
not mere
irresponsibility. It is both an inaccurate and prejudiced portrayal of
social trends.
Back to the policy proposal:
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
NRIPS CONTINUES:
With a criminal
environment like this, the development
of an index giving us a lead on whether or not a crime has been
commited by a foreigner
or not is being demanded (motomerareteiru).
[continues below]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
MY COMMENT:
And who, pray tell, is "demanding" this? What people are in fact
"demanding"
are safe streets and crime prevention. Not foreigner prevention.
Criminality and
foreignness are unrelated, and the abovementioned statistics support
this.
"Anti-crime" policy pushes are fine, and indeed are arguably necessary
in present-day Japan. "Anti-foreign" crime pushes alone are not. They
miss
the target. It is time the NPA and its budgeteers realize that the
problem is not
so much due to an influx of outsiders. It is more due to years of
economic funk contributing
to social insecurity and a steady breakdown in Japan's social order.
Let's be honest: the "people" actually "demanding" this index
this are the Tokyo Governor, the NPA, and the Immigration Bureau (which
this year,
according to the JCLU,
released a "Joint
Statement on Strengthening Policy against Illegal Aliens in the Capital
City Tokyo"
(shuto toukyou ni okeru fuhou taizai gaikokujin taisaku no kyouka ni
kansuru kyoudou
sengen)) for political and budgetary reasons.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
NRIPS CONTINUES:
Foreigners have a
wide variety of characteristic melanin
proteins that are different than Japanese, which can be found in
bloodstains and
bodily fluids left at the scene of the crime. This is why we will
develop an index
which reveals, even in minute traces of organic material, the special
characteristics
of foreigners, in order to make heads or tails of things (suitei) in
ways we never
could before. [continues below]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
MY COMMENT:
First of all, there are already means available for DNA testing in
Japanese forensics,
so even if the scientific claims here of Japanese genetic uniqueness
were valid,
this does not clearly justify more budgetary outlay for overlapping
programs.
But the science behind this "racial profiling" is bogus. Japan has a
long
history of mixed DNA--from Koreans, Chinese, Ainu, and Ryukyuans (John
Lie, MULTIETHNIC
JAPAN, 2001). Plus as noted above, there are now hundreds of thousands
of Nikkei
residents with DNA from South America (even those with "pure Japanese
DNA"
will incorrectly register as "Japanese", despite being foreign). Then
factor
in decades of international marriages (recently over 40,000 couples
domestically
per annum), leaving traces of "foreignness" in Japanese children from
practically
every country in the world. And don't forget those 300,000 people who,
according
to the Minstry of Justice, have naturalized since 1968. The author, one
of them,
would definitely test positive not just as "Caucasian", but also as
erroneously
"foreign" under NPA rubric.
Thus the police are making the fatal mistake of assuming Japanese
citizenship is
a matter of race. They are ignoring recent worldwide DNA tracking and
human genome
work which is showing that no country in the world is genetically
"pure".
This is not science. This is -- even under the strictest definitions
possible --
racism.
Speaking of definitions, the very concept of "race" itself is these
days
being called into question. Cf. premier scientific journal Scientific
American article,
December 2003:
"Does Race Exist? If races are defined as genetically discrete groups,
no. But
researchers can use some genetic information to group individuals into
clusters with
medical relevance."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00055DC8-3BAA-1FA8-BBAA83414B7F0000&ref=sciam&chanID=sa006
That's right: individual clusters for medical purposes. Not nationality
purposes.
But even then, Scientific American is making clear that race is a
matter of trend
and tendency, not of groups definable with any statistical significance.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
NRIPS CONTINUES:
THE PURPOSE AND
INTENTION OF THIS POLICY:
In our country (wagakuni), crimes by foreigners coming to Japan are
rising in recent
years. This policy aims to swiftly clear heinous crimes which
foreigners are thought
to have had a hand in. Because it will greatly contribute to securing
public safety
as well as safety in the livelihoods of Japanese citizens (kokumin),
development
of this research will come under the "Restoration of Livelihoods
Program"
(seikatsu ishin puroguramu) in the "Seven Reforms Program" (nanatsu no
kaikaku puroguramu), raised within our "Basic Aims" (kihon houshin). It
will fall under the goal of "securing public peace and safety for
Japanese citizens
(kokumin), and securing a society where people can be reassured of
making a living"
(anshin shite kuraseru shakai) [continues below]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
MY COMMENT:
Y'know, when it comes to vehement gaijin bashing, I think this ranks in
the top ten
of statements I've ever read. And it was written not by some right-wing
extremist
group, but by our police forces.
Let's leave aside the canard that foreign crime is rising. Feast on the
fascinating
rhetoric: "our country" (doesn't it belong to the foreign residents and
taxpayers too?); "kokumin" (don't foreigners also deserve police
protection
from crime?); the overall tone of how foreigners are harming Japan by
undermining
security and the means for citizens to make a living.
Most wince-inducing is the choice of words for the "Seikatsu Ishin"
Program.
Note that this is the same "ishin" used for the Meiji Restoration
(Meiji
Ishin). As though Japan is now believing in false gods and "true
lifestyles"
must be "restored". Quite an ambitious policy for some cops holed up in
a think tank. Perhaps they hail from Satsuma.
I may be reading too much into mere slogans, but indulge me a minute.
It is redolent
of what happened the day I naturalized, which to me is indicative of
some police
attitudes. Excerpted from a report I released on October 26, 2000: (http://www.debito.org/kikaupdate5.html)
-------------------------------------------------
A VISIT FROM JAPAN'S SECRET POLICE
It was October 11, 2000. I was waiting for my citizenship papers to be
processed
at the Nanporo, Hokkaido, Town Hall when my cellphone sounded. It was
my wife, saying:
"We've got some police over at our front door. They want to talk to
you."
"What about?" She wasn't sure. "Okay, don't let them in. They want
to talk, they can come here and meet me in the lobby. I'm just sitting
here writing
essays."
Five minutes later two cops sat down next to me for a chat.
COPS: "Arudou-san, we read in the papers that you have become a
Japanese citizen.
Congratulations."
DEBITO: "Papers? You mean newspapers? My name has been in the press?"
COPS: "Actually, what we mean is that we saw your name in internal
documents
and have been reading about your activities in the media. Otaru Onsens
and all that."
DEBITO: "Do you guys have a meishi?"
They quickly brought out ID. They were the Houmushou Hokkaido Kouan
Chousa Kyoku
(Ministry of Justice Hokkaido Public Safety Survey Bureau). Who? The
Kouan are a
part of the police force with secret budgets (which do not have to be
revealed, explained,
or justified to the public), secret duties (people aren't really sure
exactly what
they do), and powers to spy on potential troublemakers (such as Aum or
the Russians),
keeping tabs on suspects who still retain freedom of movement (more
evidence
at http://www.debito.org/kikaupdate5.html)
DEBITO: "So what do you want from me?"
COPS: "Two things. First, we have been told that you have received
menacing
phone calls at home. People calling in the middle of the night and
hanging up, repeated
redialings, people punching phone buttons for several minutes at the
other end, etc,
right?"
DEBITO (wondering how they knew all that): "Yes, that's right.
Sometimes every
day for a couple of weeks. They've tapered off a bit, but I expect them
to pick up
again sooner or later."
COPS: "Well, now that you are a Japanese citizen, we want this
harassment to
stop. We would like more details if possible."
DEBITO: "Then talk to my wife; she takes the calls. And the other
thing?"
COPS: "We would also like to know about illegal aliens (fuhou
gaikokujin). As
you know, their numbers have been increasing recently thanks to
overstayers and smuggling
organizations like Snake Head, and it is our job to keep them under
administrative
guidance. Would you happen to know the whereabouts of any?"
DEBITO: "Nope."
-------------------------------------------------
I was not lying, of course--for how many illegal Chinese would I know
up in Hokkaido,
where the foreign population is far below the national average? Anyway,
the point
I'm getting at is the very day I became a Japanese citizen, the Kouan
expressly believed
it was now within their mandate to protect my rights. As if not so
beforehand. And
this attitude shines through in this NRIPS policy proposal.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
NRIPS CONCLUDES:
THE NECESSITY OF THIS POLICY:
This policy is related to the "Nanotechnology Field" drawn up under the
"Strategy Prioritizing Scientific Technology" (kagaku gijutsu no
senryaku
teki juutenka) by the General Scientific Strategy Council. It is
essential for realizing
the "Country where Safe and Secure High-Quality Lifestyles are
Possible"
goal raised under the "Scientific Strategy Basic Plan".
BUDGET:
Requested for FY 2002: 21,738,000 yen.
RESULTS ETC:
Thanks to the development of an index which will reveal the varied
organic materials
which are different from Japanese, we expect that this policy will
contribute to
making the investigation and clearance of crimes committed by
foreigners much easier
and shorter, and be useful in securing peaceful and safe livelihoods
for Japanese
citizens (kokumin). [ENDS]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I CONCLUDE:
No it won't. It may even have the opposite effect. At best, this test
will give incorrect
results (thanks to the "false positives" of some Japanese of mixed
descent
testing as "foreigners", and vice versa) based upon false racial
presumptions
concerning the Japanese gene pool.
At worst, it may erroneously attribute more unsolved crimes to
"foreigners",
making the alleged "foreign crime rate" go up even further. Thus
translating
to even more tax monies being thrown at snake-oil solutions such as
these.
All this to help with crime prevention? How about allocating the 21
million yen to
some social program for people in need, and indirectly alleviate more
crime that
way?
Alas, that's not what pays policemen's salaries.
Arudou Debito
Sapporo
http://www.debito.org
January 5, 2004
ENDS
RESPONSE FROM THE NRIPS
Hi all again. Just heard that the National Research Institute
of Police Science
(NRIPS, <http://www.nrips.go.jp/>)
has
responded to my Japan Times article of January 13, 2004 (see <http://www.debito.org/japantimes011304.html>)
exposing their policies for DNA racial profiling.
Here you go. Quick comment follows.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Forensic tools no cause for bias
Japan Times, Sunday, February 8, 2004
Courtesy http://www.japantimes.co.jp/ric.htm
My colleagues and I would like to comment on the Jan. 13 article
"Forensic science
fiction," which criticizes what writer Debito Arudou says is our
proposed policy
to create "an index of foreignness" in forensic science. We believe the
writer incorrectly assumes that our efforts are aimed at
"gaijin-bashing"
or "loosening public purse strings" for an overlapping program by
instilling
fear of foreigners.
With the globalization and diversification of crimes, a study to
swiftly narrow down
possible identities of unidentified victims and/or offenders is a very
important
method in criminal investigations. Besides screening persons connected
with the crime
by conventional methods, we are aiming to develop new analytical tools
using human
biological specimens.
Even if DNA typing of an unidentified victim or offender has been
performed using
a bloodstain at the crime scene, it will remain impossible to promptly
determine
the DNA type without candidates to check it against. So, if it is
possible to estimate
the geographic area where an unidentified victim or offender was born,
an identity
will be narrowed down; as a result, a more rapid solution of the case
can be expected.
This study is not about carrying out racial discrimination.
T. TSUDA
National Research Institute of Police Science
Tokyo
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
LETTER ENDS
COMMENT: The English-language press in Japan is
small (no offense, Japan Times),
with negligible effect on domestic affairs. So you know you've struck a
nerve when
a domestic organization beholden to few, such as the Japanese Police
Agency, is concerned
enough about its image to bother to translate, read, and publicly
respond to an article
in the English press.
Clearly an embarrassment. They never expected the gaijin to be able to
read and critique
their policy pages, I guess. Good morning.
Now will they ever learn? The NRIPS still clings to the belief above
that DNA is
determined by birthplace ("to estimate the geographic area where an
unidentified
victim or offender was born"). They need another wake-up call about
just how
genetically diverse Japan actually is. Clearly my Jan
13, 2004 Japan Times article did not serve.
Arudou Debito
Sapporo
February 10, 2004
ENDS
www.debito.org
x@wO
l٧ƦѺ{ٙxEٙAƁEUЭ
ժ@oliʭ۪@Ej
QOORNPQڭQUԚJ
FAΟEBժ@olEBXЭɏEB
NAENفEgsbNXΟvEB
ƾ㜪iPQڭXjux@ѺɪFOl٧VwΡwx㢪vΏ
[ѭMEAȭAíҭ{ٙΟ孢ҭEzݶq
vEB
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
x@w
Ol٧xѺθ{ٙEٙEƁEUЭ
@魼魍wΟvIԽʭA
@@wOlxEwܪxE`IvfEE魢
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
T}ɪ[
------------------------------------------------------
@тTCg&
Omicron;Awx@Ѻ (http://www.nrips.go.jp/)
EwOl٧xѺwJЭBA{ٙE
死ʭϭЭшUЭEʭBт{Iz⏭EulE`IΩíEʭA
OlE{lÉ`IεE۪vBAܭlAEjI
ΣACkAѷAΪAɯΪAuŰWѪAyѪ[A|ɰlVA߉`㟭筭
ɁE˭EʭAN㈭EٴSEgݭuvȶη筒筪A
ΟPXUWNȭROElB{έτAȭXᭁE
ΟBEAEȭΜuêvE魁EBAɝχx@
EuDNAeXgv魂i٧{فEɸEpAҭΟۭ۪wƦ
wxVθ ɁEG E
BmE{ٙ¶e^uv^bOcԩ魢A
uܪvEʭEmΟ魍魢B筭eXg歁EE{lÿ|
Ax@wuOl٧vɸΟ魍EƁEUЭEʭ
B
------------------------------------------------------
EEAwx@ѺɭTCgݶoTΟEB
http://www.nrips.go.jp/evaluation/index.html
uOl٧πEíVفEwJ v
http://www.nrips.go.jp/evaluation/H13/link10.htmli
тEeLXgPڭAۭ
ٟXLҭo[VݰNɰbNżҭj۰ɰN
eLXgگAȭx@CzΟ孢RgݭE
B
-------------------------------------------------------
wx@ѺɭTCg
OF
{ٙU@Ol٧ѺwJ
{ٙT
@ŊέΟEAoفEIAŕIȭΟ魢AO
lWѴ٧}AssAnλEEsƦíҋ&
amp;
amp;
exist;ǭŕs˭ΌBi̭Ъj
-------------------------------------------------------
@խRgF
ǭ{ٙE_z⏭EBx@EuȪvuѴ٧vɁEA
ҭխEB魼uOlv٧}伭ۭvE᭩BAۭEE
ƬAΟEl魎lE۪BlԞϭ٧Զ
ϭɁElϭEխBA魼luOlvݶ√
_E魏EխBOlEсE٧N\ǭ٭ۭEۭB
{ ԩݶ᭵ɫ㲭vEB
@魢EOlEέΟԽEBA
[∠A٭ŕ魏Ax@ǭаC[Wu
ȪvEŕIΟEʭFXιIϭEBϭEA㓰
AɰJ㜭nlE{ɩYѮǭEEʭAɘԤAmԤA
ŻԤΟŕIηvʭ筸εEEխB
筭{ٙuŕs˭ΌvE_ǭɝλE_EڏڭEB
-------------------------------------------------------
wx@ѺɪF
@ɾۭ٧ƬA↑AE{lOOlɁEWƳ⏭
wJЭѪBi̭Ъj
-------------------------------------------------------
@խRgF
魸ѪE᭩BѪɁES˭mҋEUh䮭vEB٧E
ܭɁEWEBEvIΟȭۭEB٧i䭮lÛjE{l
ΟNҭEB}ɁE{lΟ٧EBQ
lΟ魎TCgEBR>
http://www.debito.org/crimestats.html
http://www.debito.org/ishiharahikokusaika.html
http://www.debito.org/futouhanzaitaisaku.html
@u٧Ev筭AuOlEvEIOEBoفEouŗԋA\NOsѵ
B{EEŕIΟE[Ecҭ魢AOlݰXP[vS
[gΟEEB
@EAwJЭѪɁEsExEɁEтEBтENuږs
Οsί OlEȭλEƎԲv
sAwx@ѺɭEV\ZȭΟѪ
vEB
-------------------------------------------------------
wx@ѺɪF
@ȭ↑AȶEcҭЭt魂ɱƳ⏭Μ
AEEĶo⏭ҭ魩筸AlE魎θǭݭLFf`魂A
ƦOOlBǭȭwJЭBҭΜAOlBǭȭƦO
wΟAimƁEفE@JЭAѴEWlEʭ
Ƴ⏭ΟAɜíEvԣAƦíSyE˭
mλ^ۭɁEʭBi̭Ъj
-------------------------------------------------------
@խRgFw
lE魎θǭݭLFf`xEwIEs^˭EBɝE{lA`
EΪAACkAѷAΪAnuŰWѪAnyѪ[A|ɰlVA魂E&
amp;
amp;
nbsp;IEcʭEBȭEٴqĭROEl鶋B{lAEB
AȭڳA`ݰeXg᭐EA歮ulvieXgpŰ[^
[EEjwOlxoEBx@O▭EE↑ulA`êAVΌ
_Ðq``ښҭvv AƢE⺭`NAgŰLOQm
ѺѭۭEB
@فE۶CΟAwlڒxETOvX`Ο
ЭЭ魢ʭEBƢEفE[wGڶuScientific
AmericanviQOORNPQٺjLF
http://www.scientificamerican.com/
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00055DC8-3BAA-1FA8-BBAA83414B7F0000&ref=sciam&chanID=sa006
(English)
Article: "Does Race Exist? If races are defined as genetically
discrete groups,
no. But researchers can use some genetic information to group
individuals into clusters
with medical relevance."
iijFLFwlڒxE HwÉ`IҭOѪ[vx`
᭐EAwlڒxE 魢BEAѺEÉ`IlËpɸE
L`ΣOѪ[vٓBj
-------------------------------------------------------
wx@ѺɪF
{ٙ}EI
@ŊέEEAѧNAOlΟ٧筵B{ٙEAOl
ɁE^vѴ٧ɜíIɁEʭAƦíSE
mπǭvԣAuɔ{jvΩAuVvv
ٰOŰvΟuƦVvٰOŰvuεS
˭mASխŕEBvλYJѺEʭBi
̭Ъj
-------------------------------------------------------
@խRgF
lyEOlΟ٧筵BEA٧vZd&
amp;
amp;
Omicron;EAXU`XXC٧E{lEҭEBlԞÐlEEAlC٧
O٭EBoTEA
HREF="http://www.debito.org/crimestats.html">http://www.debito.org/crimestats.html
BEuKCWobVOvπɁEB
@ȭΜAuSխŕEvɁEEEWE᭻A魼uwx
εS˭mvݭE᭩BܭEA[ƁEZR~
jeBo[iOlɁE jSڍɁEx@ɬdEE魢ۭB
@AuƦVvEۭۭE᭩BuVvΜAխɁEE
ϭjb|ҭխEҭE魢EۭBȭE魁EŕIŗ&
Omicron;筸EۭBȭAEFogE᭩B\Sʭ{ٙEB
@_∠voɁEAτAȭQOOONPOڭPO㜭EB
㜪AEZ筭ɁEAԚQlEEAAuA
ȭE۪BفEAx@EAΟAMƘΏխ¶Lխ
ҭɬΔEEC^YdθЭǭۭEBխҭEΟ筸ɁE
ʭ魸lʭڍvEBv(http://www.debito.org/kikaupdate5.html)
(English)
@pƬΟ筮EBڳEEEAڳlʭڍ魢
HɫEB
@i↑A㜪AȭEĭΟFul
sEE᭩vj
@χۭAx@EOl llʭڍ魢
SzEBڳOԩ Ex@Σ^[QeBOҭs~
EҭoԱʭEB(http://www.debito.org/chitosecopcheckpoint.html)
ɁEE᭢eXgE`IElIEۭB
-------------------------------------------------------
wx@ѺɪF
@@
@{ٙEAٽwZpŕcΟuwZpId_Ȫv∠
ϭҭuimeNmٰW[vλEɁEʭAuwZpɔ{vžv
χfuSES∠ƦíɁEǭΪvȭɸE
K{ٙEʭB
@Z@z
@14NxѪEz@21,738ƍ~
Կ@@
@{ٙΟAlE魎θǭݶoȭҭխƦOȭwJ
ЭΟAOl٧χW{فEyEíVeȪAZ
kȭEvԣAƦíSyE˭mE孮ɜҭBi鶋j
-------------------------------------------------------
@խRgFJ
EE᭻AulE魎θǭݶoȭҭխƦOȭwvEsEBw
IΟԿIEE魢A{ٙ_ҭEɁEBZpEElEu
lڒIvWԩEEǭ魢A^EwOlxEʭۭE
Ư魢EB{ŖuFalse
PositivesviUǪjƦA˭f魢f[^[θЭ魏EBE`IE
\zҭθI↑AفEǭҐٽAl^EwOl^x死
oAuOl٧}v魬ҭx@O]VΟ魎v
EB
@ΜAƁEUЭΟ孢RgvEF
@ŊέEQOOOE~ݭC`L{ٙEɭEA筮d魢ѵYE
Ο筰CpNgʭ{ٙΟ᭐EۭEۭB魍EE
IΟhE魎vEB
NݪBENXЭɏvEB
ժ@ol@
debito@debito.org
http://www.debito.org/nihongo.html
QOORNPQڭQUԚJ
ENDS