www.debito.org

"Media and Activism:  One Activist's Point of View"
By ARUDOU Debito
(debito@debito.org, http://www.debito.org)
Text of Handout for PGL IV Conference Roundtable
"Human Rights NGOs and the Media:  Allies or Adversaries?"

Saturday, November 12, 2005, 1:30 to 3:20 PM, Kyoto Sangyou University
http://homepage.mac.com/p_g_l/2005.htm

(BTW, I was but one speaker in a panel, organized by Eric Johnston, Deputy Editor at the Japan Times, which included:  Masami Ito, a Tokyo-based reporter for The Japan Times who covers the Justice Ministry and writes extensively about immigration issues; Takuya Asakura, a reporter for the Asahi Shimbun in Kobe who covers general affairs in that city; Yuji Yoshitomi, an award-winning journalist for the weekly magazine "Friday" and author who writes on Kansai area politics and society.)

MY QUALIFICATIONS TO SPEAK ON THIS TOPIC:
I have been involved in activism in Japan since the mid-1990s, working with the media to raise issues and public awareness on several discrimination issues.  I have worked with a number of internet-based human rights networks, founding "The Community" (http://www.debito.org/TheCommunity) Internet mailing list and action group in 1999.  Caveat:  I am more of a loner when it comes to organization and public speaking, rarely speaking on behalf of an established NGO--so it's harder for me to "represent an NGO's position" for this forum.  That said, the lessons I have learned about communicating effectively with the media, particularly the Japanese media, may be of interest to those wishing to do some activism of their own.

Activism in Japan can be a tough job, but not impossible.  Even in reputedly "conflict-adverse" Japan.  In large part this is due to the receptiveness of the domestic media, which I do not consider "adversarial".  It's a matter of having the right message and knowing your audience.  To that end:

------------------------------------

A:  HAVING THE RIGHT MESSAGE
When you take up an issue, you must of course convince others that it is worth listening to and doing something about.  This of course includes the media, and reporters can be as interested as any activist in covering social issues and working to improve society (for some, that's the reason why they became reporters).   How I do it, starting from zero:

1) CREATE A WEBSITE
You need an information center, and a website will act as your 24-hour setter of the record straight.  Update it, metatag it (search engines bring in interested strangers), and refer to it in future activities and email updates.  Saves time, energy, and money--all critical in a social movement with limited resources.  It will also give reporters a place to shop for information beforehand.  Many reporters write their articles before they even meet you, and are just looking for live quotes. Their questions will be more informed if they view your information site beforehand.

2) DOCUMENT
Keep primary sources alive.  Scan articles, reproduce text (Don't worry about copyright:  Fair Use Statutes permit reproduction of whole articles if you acknowledge the source and don't charge for access to it.  Point is:  keep indispensable information under your control, not under some indifferent webmaster who deletes all articles after a week.), keep weblog of your old announcements and essays on the subject.  Don't forget dates and original weblinks (even if original news websource dies).  Upkeep means established credibility and old facts and cases not fading into anecdote. If you always have facts at your fingertips verifiable anywhere at any time (I often reread what I wrote years ago, just to refresh my memory), you will stay on top of an issue, come whatever question from a reporter.  You have to be active (as opposed to passive--by definition of your label) in creating and maintaining public awareness.  

3) BE PATIENT YET VIGILANT
It may take years for your issue to catch fire, so don't be disappointed if the media doesn't knock on your door immediately.  Meantime, keep sharpening and refining your message, finding new angles and ways to keep the topic fresh and germane to today's events.  News, by definition, has a short shelf life, and if you can be there when the issue is hot, with a comment and a link to old information (showing a pattern or continuity), you will more likely succeed in getting ears.  And credibility as a future source.  Anyway, social problems take years to address, so prepare yourself to be in it for the long haul.

----------------------------------

B:  GETTING MEDIA ATTENTION
Tailor your message to the sensitivities of your listener.  A reporter for an economic newspaper will want to see the issue in terms of money, while a fellow NGO journal writer will want to see the issues of social justice.  But before this, how do you get an audience?

1) EMAIL
Build an email list of people who may be interested in your issues (ask their permission before adding--most will say yes).  Takes years before it becomes effective, but I have thousands of recipients (and hopefully readers), some of whom forward around what I write, even to fellow reporters.  Separate email lists by preference (friends, reporters, human rights lists, etc).  Expect few answers to any request or call for action--be happy with the nibbles you get.  Patience builds the regular readership, and earnest constancy builds credibility.  Virtuous circle:  the more nibbles you get now, the more future nibbles you get later if you're on the ball.

2) EVENTS AND PRESS CONFERENCES (kisha kaiken)
Yes, anyone can do them--it's just a matter of your convening it and reporters attending.  Contact the Press Club (kisha kurabu) connected with the agency or outlet you are trying to canvass, and tell them the time and place.  Simple as that.  If they come, ALWAYS have something printed up for reporters to take home and refer to--saves time and results in fewer misquotes.  For press conferences, I suggest at most 10 minutes presentation, the rest Q&A.  No more than an hour total (they have deadlines) unless they still have unanswered questions.  More in my book "JAPANESE ONLY" pg 137-8 (http://www.debito.org/japaneseonly.html).  Remember any article your issue gets is a minor miracle--a major one if they get the info right.  At press conferences, always ask for reporters or officials in attendance to leave a copy of their meishi in a pile at the front (they will--under professional ethics they must identify themselves if asked; some won't unless), then add them to your email list.

3) INTERVIEWS
Even more miraculous is a one-on-one with a reporter.  Remember that reporters are people too with values, angles, judgments, and deadlines, so talk to them like human beings.  But remember that due to editors and editorial constraints, things rarely, if ever, come out in an article as you wanted.  Still, take as much time as the reporter has and answer all questions that you consider constructive in tone to the best of your ability.  Tour guide them through your primary sources (reporters love photocopies).  Be earnest and sincere.  If you convince them of the veracity of your cause, you will have a vital avenue into the debate arena.  But remember media propensities:

------------------------------------

C:  KNOW THINE AUDIENCE
Print and broadcast media are fundamentally different.  Broadcast is shorter in attention span, also requires soundbites, good hair, non-knitted eyebrows, charisma, and an entertainment quotient (esp. Japanese TV), which may preclude interest in "serious" topics like social issues anyway.  Print lasts longer, gets edited and quoted more liberally (often to your advantage--a sympathetic reporter will correct your linguistic mistakes positively), and is more easily dispersed by email and web.  Print is also the better primary source for your info site (more reproducible).  Just remember the bents of your media outlets.  

PRINT MEDIA BENTS:
Mainichi and Kyodo are sympathetic to social issues, Yomiuri (exception:  Osaka Yomiuri) and Sankei are almost always conservative (and get defensive about anything that appears to be criticism of Japan).  Asahi is a lottery--depends on the editor, but it's inching perceptibly to the right.  Regional papers are generally liberal but it depends on the region.  Weekly tabloids are wild and unpredictable (after all, paper never refuses ink), and accuracy is at a lower priority than sales (distortion to increase drama is the name of the game).  Recommend you avoid tabloids.  (Not to worry--those reporters are used to being avoided.)

BROADCAST MEDIA BENTS:  
Again, each network is hit-or-miss, but NHK tries to be most centrist.  It is also the most clearly censored, cf. Abe Shintaro scandals with LDP politicians putting pressure on network.  NHK will, however, be more likely to take up more "serious" topics--there just has to be an overriding "public's need to know" factor behind it.  If you get on NHK, you really know you've arrived and are being taken seriously.

-----------------------------------
BARRIERS TO ACTIVISM IN JAPAN
Be aware of the social proclivities so you can anticipate media reaction:  

1) ACTIVISM IS GENERALLY FROWNED UPON IN JAPAN.  
I believe because it is associated not with success, but with extremism, since historically there is no "Sixties" liberal victory period.  Discussion in JAPANESE ONLY pg 327-330.

2) CULTURE OF INFORMATION CONTROL.  
Just about every organization, and especially the bureaucracy, is closed to outsiders, and getting them to own up to anything, let alone wringing any info out of them, will be nearly impossible without insiders and tenacious reporters who know how to play the game (a call from a reporter to an agency sends shivers).  Reporters are also necessary to get past the   

3) PRESS CLUBS.  
One-stop shopping, but also self-censorship and info control.  Biggest curb on watchdogism there is.  See Freeman, "Japan's Press Clubs as Information Cartels", at
http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp18.html

4) RESISTANCE TO CAMPAIGNING. 
There is a knee-jerk disaffection with demonstrators, and overly-overt attempts to influence the public.  So what.  Campaign anyway.  Just be aware that people aren't going to trust you or your intentions until you've been around awhile.


5) YOUR COMPARISONS TO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ARE OF LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS
esp if said human rights problem is being construed as "a matter of cultural differences" in the media.  Do make the argument that "other societies do it, so Japan should too" if you want, but don't expect much sympathy.  Cries of "cultural imperialism" are inevitable, esp in the tabloids and the pundit arenas.

6) THE CONFUSING NEED FOR BALANCE.  
This sounds nice on the surface, until you realize the media is interviewing the other, bigoted, side too.  This effectively gives credence to the racists and often promotes their issue (which is one more reason why you need to make discrimination illegal--so the reporters won't feel a need to find out "the criminal's point of view" for the sake of balance, and inadvertently justify it.

7) THREATS DO HAPPEN.  
If you think you won't get rough stuff here in Japan after appearing in the media, remember Minamata photographer attacked by thugs.  I have had lots of threats, even death threats (but if I was going to be whacked, I doubt I would have been warned).  If you have a high enough profile, there is some deterrent.  In any case, keep your family out of the media.  Culturally problematic and reprisals may be directed at them to hurt you.

------------------------------------------

GETTING AROUND BARRIERS

1) STAY SUNNY AND OPTIMISTIC,
and don't blubber about your issue to journalists.  Upbeat is inspirational.  I told you that activism would be challenging, so chin up:  it's far more challenging to be an optimist than a pessimist.

2) IGNORE UNCONSTRUCTIVE QUESTIONS AND CRITICS.  
Trying to answer those who simply will not listen, or who have an angle they're angling for, takes valuable time and energy away from activism.  Absorb their arguments and answer on your info site.  See book JAPANESE ONLY pgs 299, 311-315, 368-370.

3) REDIRECT SUNDRY QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS TO YOUR WEBSITE.  
Again, saves time and energy.  

4) BE AWARE OF COUNTERARGUMENTS
so you can formulate yours in advance.  That is why advance criticism is valuable--you can escape future ambushes in public.

5) JAPANESE SOCIETY IS SURPRISINGLY RECEPTIVE TO NEW IDEAS IF PUT SINCERELY.  
Remember that people will listen to you here even if they disagree with everything you say.  A high cultural value is placed on calmness in the debate arena, so be calm, sincere, and earnest at all times.  It's amazing how fast people sense insincerity here.  

6) LEARN JAPANESE--YOU CANNOT WORK IN JAPAN WITHOUT.
Enough said.  Get to work.

7) REMEMBER THE POWER OF PRECEDENT AND THE RESPECT FOR PERSEVERANCE IN JAPAN.  
People often will only come to believe that you are serious if you have been working at an issue for years.  So do so.  

------------------------------------------

CONCLUSION
I probably don't need to tell you this, but taking up a problem is almost always better than not.  Even if nothing budges, at least you tried.  And if it does budge, it probably would not have done without your help.  And very often the media's help.  Either way, it's better than doing nothing about it, and getting worn down by the futility of your situation.  Enlist the media in your quest--they will be receptive if the time, message, and source are right.  ENDS

Arudou Debito
Sapporo
debito@debito.org
http://www.debito.org

Back to the Cover Page

"The Community" Page

Go to the "Residents Page"

Go to the "Activists Page"

Copyright 2005 Arudou Debito, Sapporo, Japan